012 Butterfree

February 10th, 2016, 10:00 am

Average Rating: 4.00

Rate It:
punch me its actually cute

Author's Comments:

Reply samalamb, February 1st, 2016, 2:37 pm

what a cute

Reply Advertisement, October 17th, 2017, 6:59 pm

Reply samalamb, February 10th, 2016, 10:21 pm

@Sorry: alright were all entitled to out own opinions. i get that yea, but isnt the definition of a gijinka an 'anthromorphic' creature? dude im just drawing the pokemon as furries (and charizard himself is already pretty close to that) and if you dont like them thats all good and fine but you dont have to post how my arts 'really bad'. its not gonna make me stop drawing them how im drawing them, moreover kinda makes me want to /keep/ drawing them as i am.

Reply samalamb, February 10th, 2016, 10:23 pm

@Ionic Defibrillator: butterfree has a few well kept secrets

@guest: i have missed a grand oppurtunity

User's Comments:

Reply Guest, February 10th, 2016, 10:16 am

Butt Thought it was gonna say butt lol

Reply Ionic Defibrillator, February 10th, 2016, 11:12 am

Wait it's hair turned from Brown to white and had to do with caterpillars... Butterfree is a ghoul

Reply Sorry (Guest), February 10th, 2016, 7:37 pm

Im not gonna lie, this is really, bad... These dont look like gijinkas at all. They just look like you made a manly charizard and etc. The bulbasuar was cute and then the rest just, are not gijinkas by definition.

Reply SilverNinetales, February 14th, 2016, 10:50 am

@samalamb:
Gijinka:
"Mostly done in fan-art, it is the name for the humanization of any animal-like character."

This definition came from the urban dictionary.
So...he's kinda right, there not gijinkas.
There's a difference between anthromorphic and humanized.

Reply samalamb, February 14th, 2016, 11:31 am

@SilverNinetales: humanization can be a number of things, but never mind that, as correct as they may be on that subject what mostly irked me was their claims the art itself was 'really bad' simply because it wasnt what they were expecting. i for one care little about that, the idea that someone however would call (imo) good art bad bc its not the art they wanted ticks me the wrong way bc if i was a less confident artist (like my little sisters) i would stop this art project right away- and bam, there goes any amazing art i couldve produced through this

what i mean is, theres nicer ways to go about saying things, dont gotta be rude about it

Reply SilverNinetales, February 14th, 2016, 11:38 am

@samalamb:
Sorry if I was coming across as rude.

Reply samalamb, February 14th, 2016, 2:05 pm

@SilverNinetales: what??? ah naw son you werent coming across as rude at all, but thanks nonetheless for apologizing yea c:

Post A Comment